In a surprising turn of events, the South Sydney Rabbitohs have chosen not to waive the mandatory ten-day cooling-off period for emerging star Keaon Koloamatangi, leaving the St George Illawarra Dragons anxiously waiting. This decision comes at a time when Koloamatangi has emerged as one of the most sought-after players in the free agency market, having showcased his skills in 2025 as arguably one of the top props in the league.
On Boxing Day, it was reported that Koloamatangi had inked a five-year contract worth five million dollars with the Dragons, a significant move that underscores the club's ambitions. However, this exciting acquisition will not be finalized until the cooling-off period has elapsed, adding an element of uncertainty to the situation.
The ten-day cooling-off rule is part of the National Rugby League's (NRL) collective bargaining agreement, which was endorsed by various stakeholders, including the Rugby League Players Association. This regulation was introduced to mitigate the risks associated with players changing their minds after making public commitments to new clubs. While teams can opt to bypass this waiting period—something that has occurred in several recent player transactions—the Rabbitohs have decided against this option.
Reports indicate that the Rabbitohs are not planning to make a counteroffer to retain Koloamatangi, meaning there remains a possibility for the talented forward to reconsider his decision in the coming days. Should he remain steadfast in his commitment, Koloamatangi is set to join the Dragons from 2027 until 2031.
This signing represents a strategic boost for the Red V, who have been actively seeking to strengthen their forward pack but have missed out on several key targets in the past. With Koloamatangi’s addition, the Dragons could potentially enhance their competitive edge, especially given their roster of promising young talent.
But here's where it gets controversial: could this cooling-off period ultimately harm player mobility and team dynamics? Are clubs stifling their own chances at securing top talent by adhering to such rules? We want to hear your thoughts! Do you agree with the Rabbitohs' decision, or do you think they should have taken a different approach? Share your opinions in the comments below!
