The Australian Film Institute (AFI) is currently embroiled in a dramatic and highly publicised legal battle, with the ousted chief executive, Damian Trewhella, seeking reinstatement. This case has exposed deep divisions within the organisation, which runs the country's version of the Oscars and boasts an impressive list of honorary members, including George Miller, Russell Crowe, Nicole Kidman, Cate Blanchett, Baz Luhrmann, and Catherine Martin. The drama began when the institute's chair, Jack Christian, announced Trewhella's departure, citing a need for a restructure and a new general manager. However, Trewhella refuted this, claiming he had not resigned and remained committed to his role. This sparked a series of events that have left the industry bewildered and concerned.
One of the AFI's board members, Jo Smith, also departed after alleging she had been bullied by Christian. Smith's complaint to the Australian Charities and Not-for-Profits Commission (ACNC) alleges that she felt bullied and had governance concerns ahead of a board meeting to discuss Trewhella's redundancy. This has led to a complex web of allegations and counterclaims, with Trewhella's lawyer, Elizabeth Lacey, outlining serious conduct issues and a breakdown in his relationship with the board. The AFI has alleged that Trewhella wiped data from a phone and laptop, attempted to delete emails, and made public statements disparaging Australian films and the industry. These allegations have been refuted by Trewhella, who claims he only tidied up personal information and that the board was aware of his expenses.
The situation has become even more complex with the appointment of three new board members and the ongoing push for an extraordinary general meeting. George Miller, the AFI's patron, is driving this campaign, insisting the board has not been open about the restructure and has refused to engage with concerns. Miller believes Trewhella should be reinstated, citing his achievements during almost two decades with the organisation. However, the board, led by Christian, has legal and governance responsibilities and will consider any formal request for an EGM in accordance with the organisation's governing documents.
The conflict has already damaged the organisation's reputation and potentially its financial viability, with escalating legal costs. Trewhella's application to be reinstated has a hearing before the Federal Court, and the outcome of this case will be crucial for the AFI's future. The industry is watching closely, as the AFI's awards and screen culture work are highly valued, despite past stumbles and controversies. The outcome of this drama will shape the AFI's future and its relationship with the Australian film and TV industry.
